Fingerprint evidence is essential in forensic science. It’s used to identify individuals, verify identities, and solve crimes. However, forgeries and fabrications can mislead investigations, making it critical for forensic investigators and fingerprint analysts to distinguish real from fake prints. The first documented fingerprint forgery occurred in 1903 in Punjab, India, and since then, over 40 cases of fraudulent latent prints have been recorded. Yet, many cases likely go undetected. Understanding forged and fabricated fingerprint evidence is essential for examiners in order to uphold justice and avoid wrongful convictions.
What Is a Forged Fingerprint?
A forged fingerprint is a fake impression placed on an object the individual hasn’t touched. Criminals often use templates or molds of friction ridge skin. The goal is to falsely implicate someone in a crime. Forged prints might use various techniques, each with unique traits:
Detecting Forged Fingerprints
Fingerprint Evidence Examiners can often spot forgeries through distortion indicators:
The latent print examiner must be vigilant, as technology has advanced with 3D printing making forgery even easier. Studies show that 3D-printed fingerprints have bypassed certain biometric security systems at an 80% success rate.
What Is a Fabricated Fingerprint?
Fabricated fingerprints occur when an impression is intentionally mislabeled to suggest it came from a specific surface. Often, dishonest investigators use this tactic to mislead an investigation. Unlike forgery, fabrication doesn’t change the print itself; it alters the documentation.
Fabrication Techniques
Some of the most common methods include:
Spotting Fabricated Prints
Fabrication indicators include:
Why It Matters
Forensic experts, particularly latent print examiners, must have the skill to recognize forged and fabricated prints. Failing to spot fake prints can lead to wrongful convictions. To stay current, forensic professionals should receive regular training on advanced forgery techniques, from 3D printing to chemical etching. With the increasing accessibility of technology, fingerprint forgeries may become more common. As a result, fingerprint analysis standards must evolve accordingly.
Conclusion
Understanding the differences between forged and fabricated fingerprints is essential. Training forensic experts to detect fraudulent fingerprint evidence ensures ethical practices and the integrity of forensic investigations. As technology progresses, latent fingerprint examiners must remain vigilant. Research and education on forgeries and fabrications are critical to preventing these fraudulent practices in real cases.
Sources
by Kourosh Nikoui | Nov 20, 2024 | Fingerprints
Forensic Practitioner and Specialist Kourosh Nikoui, Principal Consultant and CEO of Nikoui & Associates, Forensic Identification Services & Consulting, Inc., has over 38 years of full-time experience in forensic science and criminal justice with various law enforcement agencies, government and private entities. Mr. Nikoui, a court-qualified expert, is a Certified Latent Print Examiner, Certified Senior Crime Scene Analyst, and Certified Forensic Photographer by the International Association for Identification. He has testified as an expert witness over 150 times in California Superior and U.S. Federal Courts, processed evidence in over 30,000 criminal and civilian cases, and served as a consultant to numerous law enforcement agencies. Mr. Nikoui holds a BFA degree from USD and is an active member of multiple forensic science organizations. He can be reached directly by calling (866)439-6753 or by email at [email protected]. Please visit Mr. Nikoui’s website at www.nikouiandassociates.com